Subsidiaries POCO a Redmi, both under the flag of Chinese Xiaomi, have competitive models in the sales market LITTLE X3 NFC vs Notes redmi 9 Pro.
Both smartphones have their advantages and disadvantages, but they are combined with their low price and excellent price / performance ratio. Which pair to choose? Our comparison will answer this question.
POCO X3 NFC vs Redmi Note 9 Pro: Technical specifications
| LITTLE X3 NFC | Notes redmi 9 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| dimensions | 165.3 x 76.8 x 9.4 mm | 165.8 x 76.7 x 8.8 mm |
| Weight | 215 g | 209 g |
| Used material | Glass-Aluminum-Plastic | Glass-plastic |
| Display | IPS LCD / 6.67 inch (120 Hz) | IPS LCD / 6.67 inch (60 Hz) |
| 1080 x 2400 px 20: 9 | 1080 x 2400 px 20: 9 | |
| Density 395 ppi | Density 395 ppi | |
| Gorilla Glass 5 | Gorilla Glass 5 | |
| Fingerprint sensor standard in the side edge | Fingerprint sensor standard in the side edge | |
| LED notifications | Yes | Yes |
| processor | Snapdragon 732G | Snapdragon 720G |
| Graphics | Adreno 618 | Adreno 618 |
| Measured power in AnTuT | 279 354 | 274 596 points |
| 4G LTE B20 band support | Yes | Yes |
| Primary camera | 64 MPx | 64 MPx |
| aperture f / 1.9 | sensor size 1/1.73 ″ | 0.8 µm | aperture f / 1.9 | sensor size 1/1.72 ″ | 0.8 µm | |
| PDAF focusing | Laser / PDAF focusing | |
| 4K 30fps video | 4K 30fps video | |
| Secondary cameras | 13 MPx ultra widescreen aperture f / 2.2 1.0 µm | 8 MPx ultra widescreen aperture f / 2.2 1.12 µm |
| 2 MPx depth sensor aperture f / 2.4 | 2 MPx depth sensor aperture f / 2.4 | |
| 2 MPx macro | aperture f / 2.4 | 5 MPx macro | aperture f / 2.4 AF | |
| Front camera | 20 MPx | 16 MPx |
| Aperture f / 2.2 | 0.8 µm | Aperture f / 2.5 | 1.0 µm | |
| SD Card | Yes - microSDXC - shared SIM slot | Yes - microSDXC - dedicated slot |
| 3.5 mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Infraport | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Radio | Yes + upload | Yes + upload |
| Drums | 5160mAh Li-Po | 5020mAh Li-Po |
| Fast charging 33W | Fast charging 30 W | |
| Wireless charging - NO | Wireless charging - NO | |
| Increased durability | IP 53 | - |
Appearance and design
Both smartphones offer very similar dimensions with small differences. By whom Notes redmi 9 Pro offers a metal frame and glass front and rear wall, POCO offers a metal frame, glass on the front and polycarbonate material on the back.
At first glance, it may seem that the Redmi model model has more premium materials, on the other hand, given the price of the smartphone LITTLE X3 NFC the design used does not look very cheap and even to the touch it is a very high-quality workmanship without unnecessary compromises. In addition, POCO also offers increased durability with IP 53 certification.
Display: 120 Hz vs 60 Hz
In this category, the POCO smartphone explicitly wins the duel. The pair of smartphones includes a virtually identical IPS LCD display with a diagonal of 6,67 ″, Full HD + resolution and a fineness of 395 ppi.
However, the POCO offers a high refresh rate of up to 120 Hz, while the Redmi has only a "standard" 60 Hz. The difference is very noticeable and it is great to see that even such a premium function appears in cheap or. affordable smartphone.
Performance
In terms of performance, we have a duel of two different generations of processors. Redmi will offer a Snapdragon 720G processor and an Adreno 618 graphics chip, while POCO has the latest 700 series model, a Snapdragon 732G and the same Adreno 618 graphics chip. However, the performance is a pleasant surprise.
Although AnTuT's performance tests are in favor of the Redmi smartphone, both devices offer very good performance for the middle or upper middle class. Phones will have no problem with virtually any application from the Play Store, and you will also play more graphically demanding games on them in less detail.
Camera
Notes redmi 9 Pro offers a main 64 MPx sensor complemented by a secondary 8 MPx ultra-wide sensor. LITTLE X3 NFC also offers a major 64 MPx camera complete with up to a 13 MPx ultra-wide angle sensor.
Both smartphones also include a 2 MPx depth sensor and support for 4K (30 fps) video. The difference is in the macro sensor, as the Note 9 Pro got a 5 MPx sensor and the X3 NFC has a 2 MPx sensor.
The difference is also in the front camera, which in both cases is located in a space at the top of the display. The Redmi smartphone offers a resolution of 13 MPx, while the POCO offers up to 20 MPx.
Battery pack
In this category, the POCO smartphone has a slight upper edge again. It offers a battery with a high capacity of up to 5160 mAh together with support for fast up to 33W cable charging. The quick charger is included directly in the package, which is definitely a plus.
On the other hand, Redmi will offer a smaller battery with a capacity of 5020 mAh and a slightly slower 30W charging. None of the smartphones offers wireless or reverse charging technology.
Price and availability
Both smartphones are sold at a very similar price range. Notes redmi 9 Pro starts at around € 180 / $ 213 and LITTLE X3 NFC then approximately from the value of 190 € / 225 USD depending on the version. Affordable smartphones up to € 200 thus compete directly in the sales price category.
LITTLE X3 NFC
Redmi Note 9 Pro Global
Final rating: POCO X3 NFC vs Redmi Note 9 Pro
If we were to select only one of a pair of these smartphones, we would choose a new smartphone as the winner of this comparison LITTLE X3 NFC. It will offer not only a newer processor, but also IP 53 certification for increased durability, an IPS display with a 120 Hz refresh rate, a larger 5160 mAh battery and also a 13 MPx ultra-wide camera.
On the other side Notes redmi 9 Pro offers a minimum of trade-offs, a standard display and a very good price-performance ratio. This smartphone is worth choosing if you want to save some extra euros.
According to the parameters, Redmi has a 5mpx macro, but you write 2mpx in the ankle.
You're right, we fixed it. Thank you for the warning.
Ordered Poco X3 through the Germans, so I guess it will come (December 20, I also ordered Redmi Note 9 Pro via BangGood via your link and finally they did not have it in stock, they returned the money today) so we will try Poco 🙂